The post I made yesterday about Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 attracted a fair bit of attention so I thought I'd follow up with some initial thoughts on the new release. Check out the gallery of Virtual ...

If you've followed any of what I've written over the past couple of years regarding the benefits of virtualizing Windows desktop PCs, you know that I'm a really big fan of the idea. The basic premise ...

Virtual PC 2007 Sucks. It's slow. It lacks any competitive features. It's nothing but a warmed-over Virtual PC 2004 with a few bug fixes. But that's OK. Microsoft wanted it this way. In fact, Virtual ...

Ever since VMRC Plus came out I've been spending more and more time with Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1. As you may recall, I extolled the virtues of VMRC Plus a week or so ago, and since then I've been ...

All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more. Last ...

Following up on my early-January O/S virtualization writeup (part 3 of a four-course discourse), along with an earlier heads-up announcing the release of Virtual PC 2007's beta version, Virtual PC ...

Due to fact that there appears to be some urgency I wouldn't bother with vpc2007 and use the free vmware server product instead. I've had very good success with it not just with Linux but other less ...

I'm actually kind of new to trying beta OSes and using virtual environments. Anyway I got Windows 7 running on Virtual PC 2007 but all the graphical bells and whistles are not running.<BR><BR>I ...

For me, the bottom line is that Virtual PC 2007 and Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 are not worth bothering with anymore and any company that has standardized on them should be planning to get off that ...

A bug in Microsoft’s software gives hackers a way to exploit virtual Windows machines which would be attack-proof if they were running on real hardware, a researcher said today. The flaw is in some of ...