The Justice Department and federal courts are struggling to keep up with the exponential increase in federal court cases of immigrants in custody who are challenging their detentions, another result of the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies across the country.

The Trump administration’s slapdash immigration enforcement keeps causing federal judges to speak out.

By Nate Raymond BOSTON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The top U.S. immigration judge has told her colleagues that they are not bound by a federal court ruling that declared the Trump administration cannot place thousands of people in mandatory detention without an opportunity to be released on bond.

A federal judge ruled that the academics, who are party to a lawsuit alleging U.S. policy singles out noncitizens for detention or deportation over their pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses,

David Koelsch recounted being a couple of blocks away from the shooting scene on Saturday when he heard a loud bang and saw a green fog in the distance before feeling the effects of tear gas.

Whistleblower Aid called the new policy a "complete break from the law" and said it undercuts the "Fourth Amendment and the rights it protects."

A federal judge has criticized what he calls the “indefensible” actions of federal immigration enforcement agents in Iowa.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez pressed the federal government on the goals of the large immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota during a hearing on a state lawsuit asking her to end it. “The goal of this operation is to enforce federal law,